[Dirvish] Small question on the use of hardlinks in dirvish

Johannes Kastl bierkastl at freenet.de
Mon Jul 10 15:19:58 UTC 2006

Am 10.07.2006 13:28 schrieb Paul Slootman:

> Note that the modification time is different, so dirvish won't hardlink
> this file from the previous image, as it is NOT the same file in all
> respects; if it did, then the information about the modification time
> would be lost.

I will try again with a file that has exactly the same time.

> This is an extra note, in addition to the other points already brought
> up... so don't complain that it doesn't do the hardlinking even if you
> do cp -p :-)

Ill have a look.

Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists
elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.dirvish.org/pipermail/dirvish/attachments/20060710/d55699a0/attachment.sig>

More information about the Dirvish mailing list